Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr ; 78(4): 810-816, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38284650

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Treatment of functional constipation (FC) in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is challenging due to sensory and behavioral issues. We aimed to understand whether antegrade continence enemas (ACEs) are successful in the treatment of FC in children with ASD. METHODS: A single-institution retrospective review was performed in children diagnosed with ASD and FC who underwent appendicostomy or cecostomy placement from 2007 to 2019. Descriptive statistics regarding soiling and complications were calculated. RESULTS: There were 33 patients included, with a median age of 9.7 years at the time of ACE initiation. The average intelligence quotient was 63.6 (SD = 18.0, n = 12), the average behavioral adaptive score was 59.9 (SD = 11.1, n = 13), and the average total Child Behavioral Checklist score was 72.5 (SD = 7.1, n = 10). Soiling rates were significantly lower following ACE initiation (42.3% vs. 14.8%, p = 0.04). Behavioral issues only prevented 1 patient (3.0%) from proper ACE use. Eleven patients (36.6%) were able to transition to laxatives. There were significant improvements in patient-reported outcomes measures and quality of life. CONCLUSION: Placement of an appendicostomy or cecostomy for management of FC in children with severe ASD was successful in treating constipation and improving quality of life.


Subject(s)
Autism Spectrum Disorder , Fecal Incontinence , Child , Humans , Quality of Life , Autism Spectrum Disorder/complications , Autism Spectrum Disorder/therapy , Constipation/therapy , Constipation/complications , Cecostomy/adverse effects , Enema/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Fecal Incontinence/etiology , Fecal Incontinence/therapy , Treatment Outcome
2.
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr ; 75(1): 59-63, 2022 07 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35442227

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Studies assessing adult inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patient perspectives on biosimilar use revealed that most were unfamiliar with biosimilars and had a negative perception. The objective of this study was to evaluate the perspectives of pediatric patients with IBD and their caregivers regarding biosimilar use and non-medical switches. METHODS: A survey was given to a cross section of patients with IBD ages 11-21 years receiving the intravenous anti-tumor necrosis factor originator and caregivers of patients with IBD ages 3-21 years receiving the originator. Recruitment occurred via mail, during clinic visits, and infusions. Fisher exact tests were used to test for statistically significant differences. RESULTS: Response rate amongst caregivers was 49% (n = 98) and among patients was 35% (n = 67). Sixty-four percent of caregivers and 79% of patients had never heard of biosimilars. There was increased discomfort surrounding the use of biosimilars and switching to a biosimilar amongst caregivers who had previously heard of biosimilars compared to caregivers who had not previously heard of biosimilars ( P < 0.05). Similar concerns were not seen in patient respondents. The length of time on the originator had no effect on patient or caregiver concerns related to biosimilar efficacy, adverse effects, or switches. CONCLUSION: The majority of pediatric patients and caregivers had never heard of biosimilars. Caregivers that had heard of biosimilars before the study were more likely to have a negative perception of them. This study highlights the importance of providing thorough and accurate education to pediatric patients and families regarding the safety and efficacy of biosimilars.


Subject(s)
Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases , Adolescent , Adult , Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals/therapeutic use , Caregivers , Child , Child, Preschool , Chronic Disease , Humans , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/drug therapy , Infliximab , Surveys and Questionnaires , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha , Young Adult
3.
Am J Perinatol ; 38(5): 469-476, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31600794

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to describe the frequency and characteristics of anticonvulsant medication treatments initiated in the neonatal period. STUDY DESIGN: We analyzed a cohort of neonates with a seizure diagnosis who were discharged from institutions in the Pediatric Health Information System between 2007 and 2016. Adjusted risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals for characteristics associated with neonatal (≤ 28 days postnatal) anticonvulsant initiation were calculated via modified Poisson regression. RESULTS: A total of 6,245 infants from 47 institutions were included. There was a decrease in both phenobarbital initiation within the neonatal period (96.9 to 91.3%, p = 0.015) and continuation at discharge (90.6 to 68.6%, p <0.001). Levetiracetam (7.9 to 39.6%, p < 0.001) initiation within the neonatal period and continuation at discharge (9.4 to 49.8%, p < 0.001) increased. Neonates born at ≥ 37 weeks' gestation and those diagnosed with intraventricular hemorrhage, ischemic/thrombotic stroke, other hemorrhagic stroke, and hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) had a higher probability of anticonvulsant administration. The most prevalent diagnosis was HIE (n = 2,223, 44.4%). CONCLUSION: Phenobarbital remains the most widely used neonatal seizure treatment. Levetiracetam is increasingly used as a second line therapy. Increasing levetiracetam use indicates a need for additional study to determine its effectiveness in reducing seizure burden and improving long-term outcomes.


Subject(s)
Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use , Hypoxia-Ischemia, Brain/complications , Levetiracetam/therapeutic use , Phenobarbital/therapeutic use , Seizures/drug therapy , Cerebral Intraventricular Hemorrhage/complications , Databases, Factual , Female , Gestational Age , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Male , Retrospective Studies , Seizures/diagnosis , Seizures/etiology , Stroke/complications , United States
4.
J Neonatal Perinatal Med ; 11(1): 29-35, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29689738

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to determine factors associated with long-term intermittent positive pressure ventilation (IPPV) in extremely preterm infants. METHODS: Study setting was a ten bed pod (SBP) part of the Level IV all referral NICU, dedicated to the care of infants born at <27 weeks and which utilizes a protocol-driven approach to care. All admissions to the SBP from 2005 to 2011 were included if admitted in the first week of life and alive at 56 days of age. RESULTS: There were 210 patients and 35% were on IPPV for ≥56 days (for the purposes of this study defined as long-term IPPV). Long-term IPPV patients were born earlier, had lower birth weight, were admitted later, and more likely to come from a level III NICU. LTV patients were more likely to have a PDA ligation, receive dopamine, receive TPN longer, and receive supplemental oxygen at 36 weeks PMA. In logistic regression modeling transfer from another Level III NICU (OR 3.7, 95% CI 1.5-9.2, p = 0.006) and recieveing dopamine (OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.5-6.3, p = 0.002) were associated with long-term IPPV. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of infants born at <27 weeks gestation 35% were on long term IPPV. There are identifiable factors known on admission and occurring during the NICU stay that are associated with long-term IPPV.


Subject(s)
Birth Weight , Infant, Extremely Premature , Intermittent Positive-Pressure Ventilation , Cardiotonic Agents/therapeutic use , Dopamine/therapeutic use , Ductus Arteriosus, Patent/surgery , Gestational Age , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Intensive Care, Neonatal , Patient Transfer , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...